Propaganda Pipeline: This term refers to the method by which fringe actors (such as those on the alt-right) insert their ‘messages’ into the mainstream through a series of steps-most typically starting with online platforms such as Reddit and 4chan, through especially influential figures such as Alex Jones and the Drudge Report, to the very end, mainstream news outlets.
Case Study in “Spirit Cooking: This is, basically, a fragment of the propaganda pipeline. A marginalia account of Hillary Clinton taking part in occult rituals started on Reddit and spread with the help of some people such as Mike Cernovich or Cassandra Fairbanks, then soon after reached such mainstream connections as Sean Hannity and, for example, the Washington Times.
Role of Russian Information Operations: The existence of a pipeline notwithstanding, the text claims that powerful political narratives are spawned principally by established media and political elites rather than by fringe actors. Russian actors, however, may take advantage of not-yet-covered schisms in the media ecosystem to promote certain narratives.
Effects of Russian Interference: The text recognizes the existence of Russian activity in American politics but warns it may not be as great as it seems. The first of such cases is that the efforts of Russian disinformation aim primarily at creating disunity and undermining the credibility of institutions rather than directly affecting the outcomes of elections.
Right-Wing Media Vulnerability: According to the text, the Raptor-right media ecology that creates a partisan-based narrative and shows disdain for mainstream media is more susceptible to Russian types of propaganda owing to existing vulnerabilities.
Russian Tactics:
• Social Media Manipulation: The charges claim that the Russians exploited fake accounts (bots, sockpuppets) and procured targeted political ads with the goal of spreading divided narratives, creating protests, and doing the damnedest to undermine Hillary Clinton.
• Propaganda Pipeline: Russian agents ripped before them an already-existing fissure in the media ecosystem, particularly in the right-wing fringe, to amplify the sounds of their narratives.
• Useful Idiots: Some aspects of American media knowingly or unknowingly marketed narratives that were developed in Russia.
• RT and Sputnik: These are the state-funded Russian media that collaborated in taking a big role in disseminating propaganda toward other media outlets.
Guccifer 2.0″ Controversy:
• Allegedly, this Romanian hacker claimed DNC hack but was thought to be a whistleblower from Russia.
• A group of former intel officials (VIPS) challenged the official story, claiming the DNC hack might have been done inside.
• This hoax caught on with right-wing media but was mostly debunked later.
Impact of Russian Interference:
• The text maintains that the most apparent purpose of disinformation efforts was to divide and undermine trust in democratic institutions rather than to impact elections directly.
• It will hard to place the Russian impact on the numbers, but it can well be expected to have increased any existing divisions within American society.
Facebook’s functionality:
• One of the Facebook platform features concerns featuring remarkable applications capable of micro-targeting individuals while placing ads for votes in favor of a candidate.
• This tool was well adopted by Trump’s campaign, where they targeted messages directed to particular population segments.
• There have been concerns on the usage of such abilities by the models to manipulate and mislead voters.
Cambridge Analytica:
• Data by this analytics company was collected from millions of Facebook users for purposes of creating psychographic profiles on voters.
• They claimed to have massively affected the Trump campaign, although it has not been clear how their approaches affected those who voted.
• This company faced criticism due to the nature of using privacy violation as well as dubious means.
Effectiveness of Microtargeting:
• According to scientific evidence, the effects of microtargeting on personality types are not highly effective.
• Research has evidenced that some persons would be to be swayed with personalized ads while others may be turned off completely.
Suspicion about Data-driven Campaigns:
• Privacy issues arise with manipulation and gradations in public discourse.
• The very concept of microtargeting could result in an “echo chamber” that confines people to receiving only that information which fits with their own biases and predilections.
Some Rules Needed:
• The above text states the need for new laws to cover potential harms associated with data-driven political campaigns.
• Such measures include setting minimum standards for disclosure and requirements for transparency and prohibitions on certain types of data use.
-
Chapter 3: Using Tracker Signatures to Map the Techno-Commercial Underpinnings of Fake News Sites
In this chapter, the commercial and technical architecture that facilitates the internet dissemination of false information is examined. It presents “tracker signatures,” which are distinct digital fingerprints left by monitoring systems that are integrated into websites. By examining these indicators, researchers can determine the network of businesses and technological advancements that underpin these
websites, exsosing uel ungenlyne nndngng sources and usiness meuods.
-Tracking Technologies: A variety of tracking technologies, including cookies, pixels, and social media plugins, are frequently embedded on websites. Platform interoperability, audience measurement, and targeted advertising are made possible by these tools, which gather user data.- Wacker signatures. Vata gatnering mernoas, domain, and purpose are all unique to each monitoring technoloky. Inrougn the
examination of these sienatures, scholars can produce an all-encompassine map of the technologies utilized on a specific website
-Mapping the Ecosystem: Researchers can utilize tracker signatures to pinpoint the businesses that are responsible for these technologies, including analytics platforms, data brokers, and advertising networks. This highlights the business motivations that propel the fake news ecosystem’s operations and how linked they are.
-Discovering Funding Models: Researchers can determine a fake news site’s possible funding streams by examining the data brokers and advertising networks connected to it. This could include money made via affiliate marketing, data sales, and ad clicks.
-identifier Shared Infrastructure: By comparing tracker signatures from several fake news websites, one can identify shared infrastructure, like analytics platforms or advertising networks. This raises the possibility of coordination or complicity amongst these
websites.
-Investigating Influence activities: Potential foreign influence activities can also be found with the aid of tracker signatures. Researchers can follow the information flow and spot possible actors attempting to sway public opinion by examining the source and destination of data gathered by tracking technologies.
•Comprehending the Business Model: Researchers and policymakers can create more potent tactics to stop the spread of fake news by comprehending the techno-commercial foundations of these websites. Increasing transparency in the digital advertising ecosystem, targeting the businesses that support their operations, and upending their revenue sources are some possible ways to achieve this.
The development of technical countermeasures, such as browser extensions that block particular trackers or algorithms that identify and flag questionable patterns of monitoring activity, might be influenced by the knowledge gathered from examining tracker
signatures.
-Increasing Public Awareness: -Knowing the business interests that propel the dissemination of fake news can facilitate critical interaction with online information and increase public awareness of the dangers.
highlights how analyzing the “tracker signatures” found on false news websites shows a sophisticated network of linked technology and business interests. The network of businesses involved, including advertising networks, data brokers, and analytics platforms, may be mapped by researchers by examining the distinct digital fingerprints left by monitoring tools like cookies and pixels.
The profit-driven systems that facilitate the dissemination of false information are shown by this “under-the-hood” perspective. It may uncover, for example, how a news website that appears to be independent depends significantly on ad click revenue from aggressive data collection and targeted advertising, which encourages the spread of sensational and false information. Gaining an understanding
of this complex ecosystem is essential to creating countermeasures that work, like upending revenue streams, enhancing transparency in the digital advertising sector, and giving users the power to manage their data and choose the information they want to consume.
- Wacker signatures. Vata gatnering mernoas, domain, and purpose are all unique to each monitoring technoloky. Inrougn the
-
Common Types of Fakes
As we work with social sources, it’s important to understand the most prevalent types of fake content shared via social networks.
Wrong time / wrong place
The most prevalent kind of deceptive content is old images or videos that have been taken out of context and reposted with statements about a recent news event. Using the methods listed below, it is usually easy to refute this content, which is frequently unintentionally posted on social networks.• For example —> Aleksandr Kristen, a Latvian MP from the nationalist VL/TBLNNK party opposed to resettlement of predominantly Middle East and African refugees within EU, posted a tweet on June 20, 2016, mocking the notion that highly-skilled workers would be among the arrivals. To illustrate his point, Kristen’s chose a picture of dark-skinned protesters vandalising a car.In reality, the picture had nothing to do with the
thousands of refugees arriving in Europe that summer: it was taken in Baltimore, USA, after a local man died in police custody.
(http://ledition.cnn.com/2015/04/272 us/baltimore-unrest/)Manipulated content
“Digitally altered material created with Photoshop and other picture or video editing software is less frequent than “wrong time/wrong place” stuff. It can be harder to spot this content than “wrong time/wrong place” because it was probably shared with the goal to mislead.Staged content
Since it takes the most effort to create, staged content is the least prevalent kind of fake content. These bogus materials, which fall into several categories, were produced and posted with the intention of misleading people.
Staged videos- this type of content can look and feel very authentic.
Fake news sites
Web address err.ee is operated by the Estonian national broadcaster (rus.err.ee is its Russian affiliate). However, there is a website eer.ru, which can and does lead to confusion among average users because they appear to be visually identical to each other, (and many more like them) for instance when looking at news websites. Run by the NPO’s “International Institute Of The Problems Of Sustainable Development”, it describes itself as an information agency specializing in ”Foreign Trade Relations”. As described in the self description account formulated by Spravkaforme.ru, the corporation embodies as an online media with five news websites, number of over a million unique visitors per month, and ‘editors’ work hand in hand with the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It hires freelance writers and pays them on a per article with a set number of clicks basis.Local viral content
In recent years, the phenomenon of local viral content has emerged as fake content websites postura stories about places, such as terrorist attacks or fights of celebrities. Unofortunately, most of these reports remain poorly sourced, but from time to time, local outlets come across some allegations and decide to write a preposterous story around them.
- for example : a bleak video of a youngster lamenting Latvia as a failed state quickly gained popularity and went viral on Latvian Facebook pseudone-ws Sites in Dec, 2016. Within a week it was viewed 155,000 times on YouTube alone.
The video itself was a copycat of similar American story “Dear future generations: sorry” which has been watched almost 5.7 million times at the time of writing. A simple YouTube search revealed the author to be a wannabe YouTuber whose videos usually get around 5,000 views. However, the video was passed as a genuine and popular opinion piece in the Latvian social networks and pseudonews sites.
-
Can Democracy survive the internet?
The rise of the internet cannot be attributed to the erosion of democracy. There are other more crucial drivers in US politics such as the gradual disintegration of the Republican Party which has taken place long before.
The two main factors that have contributed to the rise of political polarization in the US:
- Media Deregulation: This allowed for the emergence of powerful right wing media outlets like Fox News and talk radio which created echo chambers and fostered partisan divides.
- Social and Cultural Shifts: The civil rights and women’s movements along with changing social values led to a deeper societal divide further fueling political polarization.
These factors have resulted in two distinct media ecosystems: a right wing media ecosystem dominated by partisan narratives and a more balanced ecosystem that includes professional news outlets and social media.
Polarization in American Politics
American politics is increasingly polarized, with Republicans shifting further right than Democrats. This asymmetry stems from historical factors like the rise of religious conservatism and the influence of business interests. Political elites play a significant role shaping public opinion and exacerbating divisions. Affective polarization characterized by negative feelings towards the opposing party is also on the rise. Social identity particularly party affiliation strongly influences political views, often overriding individual policy preferences
The Origins of Asymmetry
- Asymmetric Media Landscape:
The American media landscape is heavily skewed towards the right. Early attempts to establish left wing media faced significant hurdles while figures like Father Coughlin gained popularity with their emotional and often conspiratorial rhetoric. The rise of professional journalism with its emphasis on objectivity, inadvertently suppressed more partisan voices particularly on the left.
The Hutchins Commission established in 1947 sought to define the role of the press in a democratic society emphasizing truth open dialogue and serving the public interest. While it highlighted the importance of these principles it also acknowledged the media’s shortcomings such as sensationalism corporate influence and the perpetuation of misunderstandings. Ironically the Commission’s emphasis on objectivity and professionalism while intended to improve media standards may have inadvertently contributed to the suppression of alternative voices and perspectives.
Post War Media Landscape: The post World War 2 era saw a period of relative stability in American politics. The New Deal coalition dominated and the rise of professional journalism fostered a sense of objectivity. However right wing media remained largely marginalized with limited reach and influence.
The Rise of Right-Wing Media:
It was fueled by several factors including technological advancements like cable television and satellite broadcasting which expanded reach. Deregulation of the media landscape removed barriers for new outlets.Televangelism provided a platform for conservative religious leaders to promote their views. And the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine coupled with the rise of figures like Rush Limbaugh empowered talk radio as a powerful voice for conservative ideology. The launch of Fox News in 1996 marked a turning point offering a 24/7 news channel that catered specifically to a conservative audience.
- The “Fox News Effect”: The research shows that Fox News on the local television market caused a movement of people to support Republican candidates which increased the republican voter turnout.
- Limited Impact of Online Media: social media doesn’t stir the pot as well for polarization in politics for example Fox News and other similar forms of media.
- Age and Media Consumption: Old people who for instance tend to be pro Trump but polarized would not be so active on social media implying that Fox News and similar outlets would have greater clout.
The internet has both Positive and negative impact.
On the positive side the internet can help to decentralize power and give voice to a wider range of people. It can also enable new forms of activism and political participation. For example the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street movements were both facilitated by social media. However the internet is also susceptible to manipulation and abuse. For example, social media can be used to spread disinformation and propaganda. It can also be used to target voters with misleading or irrelevant information.
-
A picture depicting the discovery of the Egyptian pharaoh Ramses II inside Sednaya prison
A fake news story circulated about an image supposedly showing the discovery of the Egyptian pharaoh Ramses II inside the Sednaya prison, along with some priests!!!
However, it turned out that the image was a scene from an Iranian series.

post from twitter
Claim: The discovery of the pharaoh Ramses II in Sednaya prison.
The image has gone viral on social media since December 13th, following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. It purportedly showed Pharaoh Ramses Il and priests in Syria’s Sednaya prison. Its spread during the Syrian conflict led some to believe it was authentic.
In fact, this image is not from December 13th, it was a scene from the Iranian series “The Prophet Joseph” which aired between December 2008 – May 2009.
By: Salma Ahmed
Jan 12, 2025
sources:
-
The Olympics games in Paris : it’s not true that two the Egyptian athlete raised thePalestinian flag on the podium at Paris Olympics games
In 19 feb 2024 twitter acc named ( Jackson hinkle ) post a photo for two Egyptian athletes raised
Palestinian flag after defeating the Israeli competitor . He is not the only acc to share this but also
many other acc share the same thing indifferent time during this year 2024. he shared this post
during the conflict between them to create a propaganda. He claimed that this photo taken in
2024 Paris olympic games it’s not true Karate is not included in the 2024 Paris
Olympics. This photo taken in the world championship in 21 November 2022 .A twitter post sharing the claim gained 18.1M views
By: Jackson Hinkle. Published: 19 feb 2024
THE IMAGE SUPPORTING THE FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT THE TWO EGYPTIAN ATHLETES WHICH RAISED THE PALESTINIAN FLAG AT PARIS OLYMPICS .
CLAIMS :
Egyptian athletes raised the Palestinian flag at the 2024 Paris Olympics games after defeating an Israeli competitor false claims.
The rumours spread More than one acc on twitter sharedFalse news about the two Egyptian athletes at the 2022 world youth karate championship claimed that this pic taken in 2024 at Paris olympics games after defeating an Israel competitor its not true this picture go back to 21 November 2022 world youth karate championships not in 2024 Paris olympics also Karate is not included in the 2024 Paris Olympics to reach the truth of this news we used tools to verify it and make sure of its authenticity . We took screenshots for those post on twitter to put it in google images and we found links and also other post that go back to 2022 21 November the first time this photo shared in it . Facebook acc: الـــجبالـــي حـــمدي | Hamdy Elgebaly.
shared this photo in 22 November 2022 to celebrate the win of the two Egyptian athletes in the world championship. Also news website share about it ( @ahlmasrnews.com) in 21 November 2022.
Sources :
1 /Google images
2/ Google search
علم-فلسطي-يتصدر-ترند-جوجل-لهذا-السبب-رواد/13050186/-news-light/news/com.ahlmasrnews://https 3/
السوشيال-ميديا-عملوها-الصريي-صور4/ https://twitter.com/ajarabic/status 1594415280331030530
5/ Pinterest search for images
6/ Facebook acc ( ( | الجبالي حمدي Hamdy Elgebal)7/ Twitter acc ( Jackson Hinkle) , ( Pamphlets )
by salma khaled
-
Luigi beanie associated with CEO murder suspect isn’t selling as much as people claim it is.
On December 10th, Twitter user @Deepsinghbadhesha shared this picture on his page, which gained widespread media attention and resulted in the image being mass-circulated online.
On Wednesday December 4th, CEO of the UnitedHealthcare health insurance company, Brian Thompson, was shot and killed by Luigi Mangione in midtown Manhattan, New York. 26-year-old Luigi has officially been taken into custody by Manhattan police. Since then, there has been a divide on social media regarding the Luigi Mangione situation, with multiple people sharing posts, thoughts, and even memes online. Many users have been calling him a “hero” and labeling this event as “the start of a revolution” in support of Luigi’s actions, while others are condemning it and calling it an unjustified murder. His supporters have even gone as far as to raise funds for his legal defense team on GiveSendGo, with funds reaching over $120k in the last week.
(CLAIM)
An example of this Luigi Mangione support trend is Twitter user @deepsinghbadhesha, an attorney and policy advocate who shared this post on Twitter with the caption “Y’all are so unserious” claiming that super Mario Bros. merch is being sold in the hundreds of thousands in solidarity and association with Luigi Mangione. This post got 260k likes on Twitter and 7 million views. It was then shared on multiple media platforms like Threads and Instagram, where users are actually believing that these hats are being sold in massive numbers to support Luigi, with some users even stating they will buy it for themselves. Others are saying how much of a “disgrace” it is that so many people are supporting a murder and saying nobody is taking the situation seriously.
Upon further investigation, the post turned out to be fake, with the original listing on Amazon being 100 hats sold in the last month, not “100,000 bought today.” It was also revealed that the hats have been sold out and taken off of amazon since December 10 because of sales from the holiday season, implying sales were never due to Luigi at all to begin with. So, the post was in fact digitally altered to include 3 extra zeros to mislead people into thinking that there are 100,000 people who are willing to buy hats to support Luigi.
Instagram postPost type: Carousel
First post: Second post:
Caption:
Mario Bros. beanie hats sold for how much?!
Rumors have spread online saying this Amazon seller has sold 100,000 Luigi beanies in a day as a form of support for Luigi Mangione. The reality is that these hats have only sold 100 units in the past month. However, the online support for Luigi is very real.
#Trustify #factcheking #freeluigi #mariobros #amazon #luigimagione #unitedhealthcare
Investigative report:
1. I screenshotted this post I saw on Instagram
2. Put the image on Google reverse image, and these were my results:
Didn’t find much, but there were lots of reposts on threads and even Reddit where people claimed that this is a symbol of hope and the start of a revolution.
3- next, I put the image on TinEye, where I got 2 results.
First, I found the original photo proving that the number of hats sold was 100 in the past month, not 100,000 in a day, which proved the picture was digitally manipulated and the extra three zeros were photoshopped. I also found the original tweet that spread this rumor.
4. After opening the original tweet, it turned out that X actually flagged the tweet for misinformation. Community notes below confirmed the actual truth of these beanie hats.
https://x.com/deepnotshallow/status/1866301190486765990?s=46
By: Jana Salem